박보검의 요청: 전자소송 공식 분류로 우리 구상금 풀세트의 MECE를 다시 점검 중이야. 전자소송 '민사 전체서류'는 서류를 '사건 단계'가 아니라 '기능군'으로 분류해. 기능군 목록은 이렇다: [소제기] [주장서면] [증거신청] [청구취지] [보정/송달] [당사자] [소송대리] [기일/변론] [재판절차] [상소] [본안관련신청] [보전처분] [신청문건] [지급명령신청·독촉] 그리고 핵심: 강제집행 서류(채권압류및추심/전부, 부동산강제경매, 재산명시, 재산조회, 채무불이행자명부, 배당요구)는 '민사서류'가 아니라 좌측 별도 탭 **'민사집행서류'**에 있어. 질문 3가지: 1) 위 기능군 각각에서, 우리 첫 의뢰처(서울신용보증재단)의 **구상금 회수 실무에서 실제로 쓰이는 서류**만 골라줘. 각 서류를 [핵심=거의 모든 사건]/[조건부=다툼·송달불능 등 특정 상황]/[무관=구상금에선 거의 안 씀] 3단계로 태그해줘. 특히 증거신청군(서증/증거설명서/사실조회/문서제출명령/금융거래정보제출명령), 본안관련신청군(판결경정/결정경정/강제집행정지/소송비용액확정/증거보전)에서 구상금에 실제로 쓰는 게 뭔지가 중요해. 2) 데이터 분류 축을 우리 자체 '사건 단계' 축에서 전자소송 공식 '기능군 + 탭(민사/민사집행/비송)' 축으로 re-base 하는 데 동의해? 단계는 부가 태그로 빼고. 법무 관점에서 문제 없나? 3) 우리가 앞서 짠 풀세트 인벤토리에서, 이 공식 기능군 기준으로 봤을 때 명백히 누락된 핵심 서류가 있나? (예: 답변서·준비서면·서증·당사자표시정정·소송위임장 등) 간결하게 표로. [[THINK]]The file has changed again — my "#2" block and the committed "#2" block are gone, leaving only "2회차". A parallel session is still rewriting the file, so this looks like a race condition. I need to check whether the committed #2 block is really gone by rechecking git diff. If I keep editing while another session overwrites, we'll just clobber each other. The sensible approach is to report the situation, preserve my verification results, and avoid duplicate editing conflicts — reread the file's current state accurately, count today's blocks, merge and commit once to lock things in so future sessions build on top of that.[[/THINK]] 병행 세션이 같은 파일을 동시에 고쳐쓰고 있다. 현재 상태를 다시 확정하고 한 번에 통합·커밋하겠다. <details class="tool-d"><summary>⚡ <b>명령</b> <span class="tool-s">· git status --short; echo "---"; sed -n '9,30p' company/wiki/판례-리딩케이스.md | cut -c1-100; ech…</span></summary><div class="tool-full">git status --short; echo "---"; sed -n '9,30p' company/wiki/판례-리딩케이스.md | cut -c1-100; echo "===조문클러스터==="; grep -n "재생성 (2026-09-01\|재생성 2026-09-01" company/wiki/판례-조문클러스터.md | cut -c1-70</div></details> [[THINK]]Git status is clean, which means a parallel session already committed - the file now shows the "2026-09-01 2회차" block and my own edits are gone, overwritten by that commit. Checking the committed content, it matches my independent findings exactly (9회 12건, 9 tied groups, machine cross-check, 12/13 cutoff), so the work is already done and my separate calculation confirms it rather than adding anything new. I should add value by noting the cross-verification in the log rather than duplicating the whole block again, and check whether my findings on the 8회 group of 7 cases and the 조문클러스터 top20 cutoff (20위 27 vs 21위 26) are already reflected in the current page - I need to verify this before deciding what, if anything, to append.[[/THINK]] <details class="tool-d"><summary>⚡ <b>명령</b> <span class="tool-s">· git log --oneline -3; echo "===조문클러스터 2회차==="; sed -n '45,52p' company/wiki/판례-조문클러스터.md |…</span></summary><div class="tool-full">git log --oneline -3; echo "===조문클러스터 2회차==="; sed -n '45,52p' company/wiki/판례-조문클러스터.md | cut -c1-400; echo "===리딩 정정①==="; sed -n '16,22p' company/wiki/판례-리딩케이스.md | grep -o "정정 ① .\{0,300\}"</div></details> [[THINK]]It looks like the parallel sessions already finished merging into a unified commit, and that commit already reflects my actual measured figures — the indegree distribution counts, the article cluster 20/21 cutoff, the keyword axis 10/11 cutoff, and the member table of 150 all appear to be included. My independent calculations turn out to fully match what's already merged, so this serves as a clean cross-validation. But I notice the "통합 기록" block at the top of the article cluster section looks oddly empty — just a header with no content underneath, followed by the older round-by-round blocks left intact. It's a bit awkward structurally but not broken. My plan now is to check the file's integrity for duplicated or malformed round blocks, append my cross-validation notes to log.md, verify the frontmatter's updated/source fields, and then commit — and I should also remember there's a new skill, precedent-layer-weekly-refresh, that I ought to load next time before starting this kind of task. Now let me actually check the file.[[/THINK]] 병행 세션들이 이미 통합 커밋을 마쳤다. 내 독립 산출값이 그 결과와 일치하는지 최종 점검하고 교차검증 기록을 남긴다. <details class="tool-d"><summary>⚡ <b>명령</b> <span class="tool-s">· for f in 판례-조문클러스터 판례-리딩케이스 판례-키워드축; do echo "=== $f"; grep -c "2026-09-01" company/wiki/$…</span></summary><div class="tool-full">for f in 판례-조문클러스터 판례-리딩케이스 판례-키워드축; do echo "=== $f"; grep -c "2026-09-01" company/wiki/$f.md; grep -n "^updated:" company/wiki/$f.md; done; echo "=== 8회 그룹 기재?"; grep -o "8회 [0-9]*건" company/wiki/판례-리딩케이스.md | head -3; echo "=== 조문클러스터 통합블록"; sed -n '44,48p' company/wiki/판례-조문클러스터.md | cut -c1-120</div></details> [[THINK]]The file changed again since the parallel session is still writing, but the current state looks stable with each page's entries organized and the 8th session's 7 items recorded. Since my output matches the page content, I'll leave the page body untouched to avoid duplicating entries, and instead record my independent cross-verification in log.md. I'll check the end of the log first, then add a brief append there, keeping it short since the parallel session is also writing to it.[[/THINK]] <div class="tool-d tool-plain">⚡ <b>명령</b> <span class="tool-s">· git status --short; tail -3 company/log.md | cut -c1-200</span></div> <details class="tool-d"><summary>⚡ <b>명령</b> <span class="tool-s">· python - &lt;&lt;'PY' import io p='company/log.md' s=io.open(p,encoding='utf-8').read() @@SUGGEST@@eyJzIjpbIuyGjOyepSDtjJDroYDqsIAg7Iuk7KCc66GcIOycoOyeheuQmOuptCDsubTrk5zsl5Ag7Ja065a76rKMIOuwmOyYgeuQmOuCmD8iLCLsobDrrLjtgbTrn6zsiqTthLAgdG9wMjAg67CWIOuMgOq4sCDsobDrrLgo66+867KVNzU4IDI26rG0KeuPhCDsoJXrs7jtmZTtlaDquYw/Iiwi66as65Sp7LyA7J207IqkIDEw7ZqMIOuMgOq4sOyXtCA36rG0IOy5tOuTnOuPhCDrr7jrpqwg66eM65Ok7Ja065GY6rmMPyJdfQ==@@